Legislation included as part of the massive congressional budget deal reached earlier this month will pave the way for expanded use of telehealth technologies that improve access to care and reduce cost of health care.
Personalized medicine patent claims have been under assault since the Supreme Court’s Mayo v. Prometheus decision.1 At best, patent owners and applicants with such claims are experiencing mixed results in district court and the Patent Office. And, to date, the Federal Circuit has not issued a precedential decision involving a subject matter eligibility challenge of personalized medicine. However, the Patent Office’s recent update to its Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) could signal a turning point for life science companies.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 was signed into law on February 9, 2018 in order to avert another shut-down of the federal government. Although the Act contains appropriations and budgetary provisions typical of such a bill, it also includes several provisions that are attracting the attention of pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacies, Medicare Part D Plans, and others in the industry.
On December 28, 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued Survey and Certification Memorandum Number 18-10-ALL to the State Survey Agencies clarifying its position regarding texting health care information by providers. Such clarification was needed: CMS’s individual guidance about texting had been uneven in 2017, with reports that CMS informed some facilities that texting any patient information was prohibited.
Three Department of Justice memoranda recently emerged that shed light on DOJ enforcement policies—two published memos that restrict DOJ’s use of agency guidance, and one leaked memo that directs DOJ attorneys to consider moving to dismiss meritless qui tam (i.e., whistleblower) complaints brought under the federal False Claims Act.
A federal district court in Florida earlier this month reversed a jury verdict and vacated a $350 million False Claims Act (“FCA”) award, joining the growing number of courts to strictly apply the materiality standard set by the US Supreme Court in United States ex rel. Escobar v. Universal Health Services, 136 S. Ct. 1989 (2016). Together with the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in United States ex rel. Harman v.
On January 16, 2018, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., delivered a presentation, “Fostering Transparency to Improve Public Health” to the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. In his presentation, Gottlieb provided a context for his vision of how transparency can be a “powerful tool for innovation,” discussing two new transparency-driven initiatives and one under consideration.
As was widely reported, Congress approved legislation late Monday, January 22, 2018 to provide continuing appropriations for federal agencies through February 8, 2018, ending the government shutdown that began Saturday.
A new administrative rule promulgated and adopted by the Attorney General for the state of New Jersey (the AG) will “regulate the receipt and acceptance by prescribers of anything of value from pharmaceutical manufacturers” in an attempt to ensure that prescriber’s independent medical judgment is not unduly influenced by financial relationships with drug makers.